You are here

Reflections

Consisting of relflections in a variety of categories, including:
<ul>
<li>scripture (homiletic reflections)
<li>philosophy (metaphysics or epistemology)
<li>morality
<li>psychology
<li>spiritual development
<li>science or mathematics
<li>technology
<li>medicine
<li>Church documents
<li>catechesis
</ul>

Changing the heart [Reflecting on Matthew 5:17-37]

Topics: 

This Sunday we have a lengthy reading from Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, as reported in the Gospel of St. Matthew. At the beginning of the reading, Jesus informs us that "I have come not to abolish but to fulfill." Among his teachings, we find the following commandments that serve to fulfill the meaning and purpose of the Law of Moses.

Repairing the incoherence of the term "Catholic"

While the author of "Our Secular Future", a piece in America Magazine, has some important things to say about the cultural clash between (what I prefer to call) serious Christians and the increasingly dominant secular progressive elites, the comments that follow the article point to dissent even to his employment of the term "Catholic". Given all the controversy over the meaning of the word "Catholic" and who is allowed, or not allowed, to apply that term to themselves, I propose the following solution:

Fruit of the Spirit vs. the law

Topics: 

St. Paul's letter to the Galatians (especially the part we skipped yesterday due to the observance of an obligatory memorial to Sts. Cyril and Methodius) contains important insights into the spiritual and moral life.

Faith vs. Reason?

Debates like that touted in "Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham" have never impressed me. In the first place, I've never enjoyed a debate between amateurs that pretends to be serious. In the second place, I've been exposed to much more challenging debates, for example, that between Bertrand Russell and Jesuit Fr. Frederick C. Copleston. (See "Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell". The debate between Bertrant Russell and G.K.

Evangelii Gaudium, Paragraph 40

The Church is herself a missionary disciple; she needs to grow in her interpretation of the revealed word and in her understanding of truth. It is the task of exegetes and theologians to help “the judgment of the Church to mature”.[42] The other sciences also help to accomplish this, each in its own way. With reference to the social sciences, for example, John Paul II said that the Church values their research, which helps her “to derive concrete indications helpful for her magisterial mission”.[43] Within the Church countless issues are being studied and reflected upon with great freedom. Differing currents of thought in philosophy, theology and pastoral practice, if open to being reconciled by the Spirit in respect and love, can enable the Church to grow, since all of them help to express more clearly the immense riches of God’s word. For those who long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance, this might appear as undesirable and leading to confusion. But in fact such variety serves to bring out and develop different facets of the inexhaustible riches of the Gospel.[44]

In reflecting on paragraph 40 of Evangelii Gaudium, in which Pope Francis speaks of the growth of the Church's understanding of her living faith tradition, I am reminded of the following:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Reflections